The WNBA is buzzing after Kelsey Plum of the Golden State Valkyries was assessed a Flagrant 1 foul for what appeared to be a kick—or intentional trip—against Veronica Burton of the Los Angeles Sparks in the closing moments of their August 9, 2025, matchup.
The play quickly went viral, with fans debating whether the act was intentional and if it warranted a suspension.
The Case for Suspension
- Player Safety: Any kick or trip risks serious injury and undermines the league’s commitment to protecting its athletes.
- Setting a Standard: Suspending a player for such behavior would send a clear message that unsportsmanlike conduct won’t be tolerated.
The Case Against Suspension
- Questionable Intent: LA Sparks coach suggested Plum was trying to kick the ball, not the player, and that there was no intent to harm.
- Precedent: The WNBA has not pursued additional punishment beyond the flagrant foul, implying the league found the call sufficient.
WNBA Rules and Precedents
The WNBA does not automatically suspend players for kicks or trips unless the act is deemed violent and intentional. Repeat misconduct, such as multiple technical fouls, can trigger automatic suspensions, but in this case, the league has discretion.
Final Take
Whether Kelsey Plum should be suspended hinges on how the league interprets her intent. If it was malicious, a suspension could reinforce the league’s standards. If it was reckless but unintentional, the flagrant foul might be enough.
For now, Plum remains eligible to play, leaving fans and analysts divided.